What Russel shows us here is a brilliant example of conflation and strawmanning.
He very cleverly conflates the argument against mass vaccination with the argument for flat earth and the Royal family being cannibals, so as to make anyone with a valid case against mass vaccination seem wacko. Then he strawmanas the case against vaccination with a claim that the only argument against mass vaccination was from 1 scientist from a study of 11 kids. This is so far out from the complexity and depth of the true case that it beggars belief. Then, of course, all of his sycophants in the audience lap this rubbish up and go away safe in their confirmed knowledge that "anti vaxxers" are just crazy conspiracy theorists.
Well done Russel, job done, whether you know it not, you have been a good little messenger for your masters that allow you the platform you have and as long as you stay within the correct narrative, I'm sure you will be rewarded handsomely.
But you see, the argument against vaccines is actually quite complex, and it's not just 1 scientist who questions "The Science"
We have become so conditioned to just chuck pharmaceutical fixes at our bodies without question, and also without the thought of what could be causing the issue in the first place, or whether a pharmaceutical intervention is necessary or effective at all, solely on the basis that all doctors are brilliant, know everything and must never be questioned.
We have also been conditioned into blindly trusting pharmaceutical companies, which is actually beyond stupid when you come to realise just how corrupt, criminal and completely undeserving of trust these companies are.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_pharmaceutical_settlements
BBC Question time recently pitted a member of the public who was "anti vax", whatever that actually means, against a government approved professor. I'd actually like to see Question Time allow Steve Kirsch’s team on for a debate, but there is not one government scientist who will do this, even with the option of writing their own cheque, just for turning up.
Aside from the obvious question of: Why are you not actually debating with the many highly qualified experts who disagree with this vaccine push and instead asking Joe Public to go up against a government selected expert?
These are the only questions that need to be asked.
Why is it not OK for me to just say no thanks?
Why should I have to justify to anyone that I don't want a pharmaceutical intervention? Is my body not my own any more?
Is my body mine or is it owned by the collective or Big Pharma, with punitive action and descriminiation deemed perfectly acceptable should I refuse whatever I am told I must have injected into me?
But that's the culture that they are desperate to inculcate into the masses.
This culture of taking drugs or wearing masks to protect others, people must understand is Collectivism, and that Collectivism has another name, and that other name comes with a hell of alot of very warranted dirty baggage.
Why is it so important for them to win the argument against those that don't want this vax? Because they need to take your bodily autonomy that's why. So that in the future they can scare you into taking anything at all and you won't question. Not just this but they also want to get you devalue yourself generally, be less autonomous and less of an individual, so you will be more likely still to go with the crowd.
These people are psychotic megalomaniacs with a god complex, they want nothing but absolute control and ownership of everything, and that includes your mind and body.
And that's what this whole shebang is all about and has always been about. But they wouldn't just take it away, they will instill a culture of Collectivism into the masses so that the majority end up actually wanting this law so that they can be protected and, of course, feel so wonderful in their action of protecting others. But are they actually protected?
That this whole argument can be had over a vaccine that does nothing to stop infection or transmission, so is not actually a vaccine as it does nothing to neutralise the virus, and in fact was not even designed to neutralise a virus, is beyond crazy. And yet still the majority don't seem to care that they are being manipulated down this very dark path of Collectivism at the expense of the rights of the individual, and that is frightening.
What future do people actually want? We are truly at the tipping point to a system of absolute totalitarian control right now, and a failure to recognise that will lead to catastrophic consequences for everyone.